CTFreak vs Windows Task Scheduler

How does CTFreak compare to Windows Task Scheduler by Microsoft? Here is a feature-by-feature comparison.

Feature comparison between CTFreak and Windows Task Scheduler
CTFreak Windows Task Scheduler
Deployment
Self-hosted / on-premise Yes Yes
No external runtime Yes
Single Go binary.
Yes
Docker install Yes
2GB RAM minimum recommended.
No
Linux install Yes
1GB RAM minimum recommended.
No
Windows install Yes
4GB RAM minimum recommended.
Yes
Offline license Yes
Requires Sovereign Edition.
Yes
Bundled with Windows.
Remote execution
Agentless mode Yes Yes
SSH remote protocol Yes No
WinRM remote protocol Yes No
Concurrent multi-node fan-out Yes
A Task can target a set of Nodes, executed concurrently.
No
Concurrent multi-database fan-out Yes
A Task can target a set of Databases, executed concurrently.
No
Scheduling
Business calendar support Yes No
iCal calendar sync Yes No
Per-task timezone scheduling Yes No
Orchestration
Task workflows Yes Partial
Multi-step actions within a task only.
Identity & access
OpenID Connect Yes No
SAML No No
LDAP No No
Role-based access control Yes Partial
ACL-based folder/task permissions, not true role-based access control.
Multiple simultaneous SSO providers Yes No
Security
Encrypted secret storage Yes No
Encryption key rotation Yes No
Integration and extensibility
REST API Yes No
OpenAPI specification Yes No
Incoming webhook trigger Yes No
User interface
Responsive web UI Yes No
Pricing
Free edition Yes Yes
Open source edition No No
Public pricing Yes Yes
Free.
Self-service online purchase Yes Yes
N/A.

Last reviewed: